Keep Gillson Green seeks to educate the community and provide input to the Park District about Gillson Park. We want to ensure that any plans approved follow and respect residents’ long-held view that Gillson is beautiful as it is. We do not want more parking, concrete, or structures that overdevelop and burden our wonderful park. We do support fixing roads or sewers that are broken, preserving open space, and protecting and planting trees.

IMPORTANT UPDATES:

The Park Board continues to ignore public opinion, safety, and preservation of Gillson’s trees and history. Read below for why we support the Alternative Path to improving our beloved Gillson Park.

On April 20th of 2022, Landmarks Illinois listed Gillson Park as one of 2022’s Most Endangered Historic Places in Illinois. Read more HERE.

Gillson “Improvements”

The Park Board continues to ignore public opinion, safety, and preservation of trees and history in its current 2024 “improvement” plan for Gillson. Read below for why we support a better, safer Alternative Path to improving beloved Gillson Park.

There is a safer, better alternative.

We are concerned about the Park District’s plans for Gillson road and sewer improvements, expected to begin in fall 2024. We have long favored repairing Gillson’s neglected roads and sewers. But, the Park District’s plans go beyond repair. Their plans include: 1) changing the historically significant design of two of Gillson’s roads—Middle and Harbor Drives, 2) adding a long, unattractive concrete retaining wall, 3) likely harm or death to the many trees that line the roads, and 4) a suboptimal walking and biking option, contrary to residents’ repeated requests for more and safer trails.

Among the features that qualify Gillson for listing on the National Register of Historic Places are its distinctive curved road circulation pattern and wide roads, which were part of the Prairie School desire to allow visitors to “wander” through the park as they enjoy its benefits. All the roads in Gillson are 20’ wide, providing symmetry and easy travel through the park. The original unique road pattern and wide roads were carefully thought out by the original landscape designers and have remained intact for 100 years.

Now, the Park Board wants to upend that distinctive design by narrowing Middle Drive along the tennis courts from its original 20’ to make it a skimpy pedestrian walkway only 7’ wide. We favor better walking opportunities in Gillson. But, unnecessarily narrowing Middle Drive ruins Gillson’s original design and unbalances the unique road symmetry. Moreover, such a drastic narrowing will likely harm, and may even kill, the more than 40 mature trees lining Middle Drive, some of which are original to the park. Why not preserve the trees and keep Middle Drive a more user-friendly 20’ wide?

Even more alarming are the proposed changes to Harbor Drive—the southern entrance into Gillson. The Park Board plans to move a significant part of this road 7.5’ feet north to accommodate a unprotected bike lane and a 5’ sidewalk on the south side. To do this, they will incur the expense of creating a new roadbed and moving sewers and electric lines. They will need to build a lengthy, unsightly concrete retaining wall along the north side.

Moving Harbor Drive will not only alter its original beautiful curve, but will also jeopardize the many mature trees along the road and likely loss of all of the trees in the triangle across from Sheridan Shore. When visitors enter the park, they will see a mass of concrete and fewer trees---both completely out-of-sync with the naturalistic style and open vistas to the lake that the original landscape architects so carefully achieved and residents value.

There is another option---an alternative path that makes walking and biking in Gillson safer, preserves trees and honors Gillson’s historic original design. Here’s why the Park District should abandon its plan and adopt a better, safer, and superior Alternative Path:

Public Opinion: For years, in Park District survey after survey, residents have asked for better walking and biking in Gillson. In the most recent survey, Wilmette residents overwhelming chose more trails as the #1 outdoor amenity they want in our parks. Just recently, over 300 people have signed the Bike Walk Wilmette petition supporting the alternative path over the Park District’s plan when presented with both plans. See petition and more information here. Why doesn’t the Park District listen to what residents want?

Safety: An alternative path could be totally separate from traffic and wide enough to accommodate the way residents walk in Gillson—in groups, with dogs on leashes, pushing strollers, and kids on bikes. The Park District’s proposed sidewalk is much too narrow to allow safe passing, and their proposed bike lane is dangerously right next to traffic without any protection from moving cars and trucks. The Park District ignores the transportation experts whose research shows unequivocally that keeping walkers and bike riders away from traffic on a separate multi-use path is far safer than bike lanes and sidewalks adjacent to traffic. This makes common sense, and safety should be a primary goal of the Park District. Why doesn’t the Park District rely on these experts and work to protect residents of all ages and abilities walking and biking in Gillson?

The existing roadway is 20’ wide. The proposed changes shorten the roadway to 15’ wide and add a 5’ wide bike lane and 5’ wide sidewalk.

Above in green, an alternative 10’ permeable walking and biking path that is safe and what residents want and deserve. This path is completely away from traffic.

Trees: The alternative path will not impact Gillson’s mature trees, which are far more valuable than any saplings that might be planted to replace them. Over 100 trees have been lost in Gillson in the last 40 years. Few have been replaced. Isn’t the Park District responsible for protecting our natural resources?

History: The alternative path preserves the historic design of Gillson. In fact, as seen below in yellow, the original 1937 design for Gillson includes a path in the exact location that is proposed for an alternative path. Why does the Park District choose a plan that disregards and adversely affects Gillson’s original historic design and special character?

This is the original plan of Gillson Park.

The current plan will disregard the original design and the Park’s character.

Cost: The Park District has not disclosed the cost of their plan to change the roads and add a long concrete wall. Because their plan is much more involved, we assume it will be significantly more than an alternative path. Why is the Park District wasting public funds by choosing the more expensive option and not pursuing state and federal grants available for walking and biking paths? 

Improving Gillson is an expensive and important endeavor. Over $6 million has been budgeted, and costs will likely rise during the construction process. Gillson is the crown jewel of our community. We all want the Park District to preserve what makes it so special---open space, mature trees, and wonderful design. Let’s make sure they do it right.

Please send your support for an alternative path to publiccomment@wilpark.org. Your email can be short---only 1 or 2 sentences works fine. 

Thank you.

Please subscribe to receive news and updates

We promise not to burden you with frequent emails.